Must-Reads and Thoughts on the Repression of Student Protest

These conditions are a preview of the standards Trump hopes to impose on society as a whole.

Must-Reads and Thoughts on the Repression of Student Protest
audio-thumbnail
Must Reads and Thoughts on the Repression of Student Protest
0:00
/630.025011

Must-Reads

From the salaries of DOGE staffers to the ugly history of retinol, here are some of the most important articles I’ve read this week.

ICYMI

This week, I released a podcast episode about community defense, featuring a conversation with Siembra NC organizer Nikki Marín Baena. Nikki and I discussed how we can defend immigrant communities, how criminalization is weaponized against migrants, and what community defense organizing looks like.

Yesterday, I published an essay examining Elon Musk’s recent remarks about DOGE, revolution, bureaucracy, and empathy. In the piece I explain why Musk’s claim that empathy is the fundamental weakness of Western civilization has strategic implications for those who oppose his agenda.

Final Thoughts

On Tuesday, Donald Trump wrote a post on Truth Social threatening colleges and universities that allow student protests. “All Federal Funding will STOP for any College, School, or University that allows illegal protests,” he wrote. While it’s unclear what Trump considers an “illegal” protest, his long history of making false allegations about unlawful activities—including baseless claims about election fraud, lies targeting scapegoated communities, and false accusations against his political opponents—suggests he is referring to any demonstration he disapproves of.

On Friday, the Trump administration announced the cancellation of $400 million in federal grants and contracts to Columbia University. The administration claims this decision is a response to the school’s failure to combat antisemitism on campus. Notably, the Trump administration equates any criticism of Israel or calls for Palestinian liberation with antisemitism and is broadly hostile toward higher education, historical memory, and, well, knowledge itself.

Prior to Friday’s announcement, Columbia had already been disciplining students for activities as mundane as writing op-eds in the student newspaper about the Palestine solidarity movement. In recent weeks, a newly formed disciplinary committee at Columbia has launched dozens of cases against students targeted for social media posts, participation in protests, posting stickers, co-organizing art exhibitions, and other actions involving criticism of Israel. These apparent attempts to placate the administration have failed spectacularly. However, Columbia’s interim president, Katrina Armstrong remains committed to a strategy of submission and capitulation. In a universitywide email Friday night, Armstrong stated that Columbia is “committed to working with the federal government to address their legitimate concerns.” Armstrong also promised the university would “continue to take serious action toward combating antisemitism on our campus.”

In recent weeks, the federal government has announced three investigations into alleged antisemitism at Columbia. The Justice Department has also announced an investigation into the University of California system over alleged antisemitism stemming from last year’s Palestine solidarity protests. 

Meanwhile, the Trump administration is using AI to scour the social media accounts of student visa holders for “pro-Hamas” content. The program, dubbed “Catch and Revoke,” aims to deport students the U.S. government claims have shown support for Hamas. On Thursday, Fox News reported that the administration had revoked the visa of a student the State Department accused of participating in “Hamas-supporting disruptions.”

Colleges and universities have hardly been permissive of protest or dissent over the past year and a half. Students who protested last year faced brutal arrests, suspensions, and expulsions. Now, panic over Trump’s threats to withhold federal funding has raised the stakes, fueling even greater repression. Some schools are scrambling to comply with Trump’s executive orders banning “DEI” programs by canceling events, scrubbing words like “diversity” and “inclusion” from their websites, and eliminating DEI offices.

All in all, this is a terrible time to be a student with a conscience. Politically active young people on college campuses are in this administration’s crosshairs, and repression will only escalate. Conservatives have long portrayed universities as hotbeds of “wokeness,” and the right’s hostility toward academia—especially Black studies, queer studies, and gender studies—has a long history.

While young people have more reason than ever to organize in defense of their communities, values, and futures, federal pressure is fueling an environment of stifling repression. 

These conditions are a preview of the standards Trump hopes to impose on society as a whole. If he succeeds in withholding federal funds and punishing states and municipalities that defy his agenda, we should expect even broader crackdowns on dissent. Trump’s threats to punish sanctuary cities are only the beginning. In the long run, he will attempt to use federal funding as a weapon to control us all.

We should also understand the weaponization of the Department of Justice in a broader political context. Today, the DOJ is targeting colleges and universities with allegations of antisemitism. Soon, unions, nonprofits, grassroots organizations, and movement educators will likely be targeted in a similar manner. Support for targeted communities may be framed as conspiratorial action, while support for civil disobedience may be framed as participation in a criminal enterprise. 

For now, I have no doubt that students will continue to challenge the status quo at colleges and universities—whether through underground student newspapers, radical study groups, politicized support networks, or other forms of resistance—but public actions will become increasingly risky. I don’t have any easy answers for students facing this escalating repression. I only know that we must find ways to support them—and that what’s happening on campus won’t stay on campus. The ability of students to protest and organize is deeply important, but that’s not all that’s at stake here.

Much love,

Kelly

Organizing My Thoughts is a reader-supported newsletter. If you appreciate my work, please consider becoming a free or paid subscriber today. There are no paywalls for the essays, reports, interviews, and excerpts published here. However, I could not do this work without the support of readers like you, so if you are able to contribute financially, I would greatly appreciate your help.